Building Large Applications


A small web application is relatively easy to understand. It does less stuff. That makes the application easier to understand: the UI (or REST web service) is smaller, and the codebase too.

But sometimes we need larger web applications. Morepath offers a number of facilities to help you manage the complexity of larger web applications:

  • Morepath lets you build larger applications from multiple smaller ones. A CMS may for instance be composed of a document management application and a user management application. This is much like how you manage complexity in a codebase by decomposing it into smaller functions and classes.
  • Morepath lets you factor out common, reusable functionality. In other words, Morepath helps you build frameworks, not just end-user applications. For instance, you may have multiple places in an application where you need to represent a large result-set in smaller batches (with previous/next), and they should share common code.

There is also the case of reusable applications. Larger applications are often deployed multiple times. An open source CMS is a good example: different organizations each have their own installation. Or imagine a company with an application that it sells to its customers: each customer can have its own special deployment.

Different deployments of an application have real differences as every organization has different requirements. This means that you need to be able to customize and extend the application to fit the purposes of each particular deployment. As a result the application has to take on framework-like properties. Morepath recognizes that there is a large gray area between application and framework, and offers support to build framework-like applications and application-like frameworks.

The document doc:app_reuse describes the basic facilities Morepath offers for application reuse. The document Organizing your Project describes how a single application project can be organized, and we will follow its guidelines in this document.

This document sketches out an example of a larger application that consists of multiple sub-projects and sub-apps, and that needs customization.

A Code Hosting Site

Our example large application is a code hosting site along the lines of Github or Bitbucket. This example is a sketch, not a complete working application. We focus on the structure of the application as opposed to the details of the UI.

Let’s examine the URL structure of a code hosting site. Our hypothetical code hosting site lives on

A user (or organization) has a URL directly under the root with the user name or organization name included:

Under this URL we can find repositories, using the project name in the URL:

We can interact with repository settings on this URL:

We also have a per-repository issue tracker:

And a per-repository wiki:

Simplest approach

The simplest approach to make this URL structure work is to implement all paths in a single application, like this:

from .model import Root, User, Repository, Settings, Issues, Wiki

class App(morepath.App):

@App.path(path='', model=Root)
def get_root():

@App.path(path='{user_name}', model=User)
def get_user(user_name):

@App.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}', model=Repository)
def get_repository(user_name, repository_name):

We could try to implement settings, issues and wiki as views on repository, but these are complicated pieces of functionality that benefit from having sub-URLs (i.e. issues/12 or, so we model them using paths as well:

@App.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/settings', model=Settings)
def get_settings(user_name, repository_name):

@App.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/issues', model=Issues)
def get_issues(user_name, repository_name):

@App.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/wiki', model=Wiki)
def get_wiki(user_name, repository_name):

Let’s also make a path to an individual issue, i.e.

from .model import Issue

@App.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/issues/{issue_id}', model=Issue)
def get_issue(user, repository, issue_id):


This approach works perfectly well, and it’s often the right way to start, but there are some problems with it:

  • The URL patterns in the path are repetitive; for each sub-model under the repository we keep having to repeat ‘{user_name}/{repository_name}`.
  • We may want to be able to test the wiki or issue tracker during development without having to worry about setting up the whole outer application.
  • We may want to reuse the wiki application elsewhere, or in multiple places in the same larger application. But user_name and repository_name are now hardcoded in the way to get any sub-path into the wiki.
  • We could have different teams developing the core app and the wiki (and issue tracker, etc). It would be nice to partition the code so that the wiki developers don’t need to look at the core app code and vice versa.
  • You may want the abilitity to swap in new implementations of a issue tracker or a wiki under the same paths, without having to change a lot of code.

We’re going to show how Morepath can solve these problems by partitioning a larger app into smaller ones, and mounting them.

The code to accomplish this is more involved than simply declaring all paths under a single core app as we did before. If you feel more comfortable doing that, by all means do so; you don’t have these problems. But if your application is successful and grows larger you may encounter these problems, and these features are then there to help.

Multiple sub-apps

Let’s split up the larger app into multiple sub apps. How many sub-apps do we need? We could go and partition things up into many sub-applications, but that risks getting lost in another kind of complexity. So let’s start with three application:

  • core app, everything up to repository, and including settings.
  • issue tracker app.
  • wiki sub app.

In code:

class CoreApp(morepath.App):

class IssuesApp(morepath.App):
    def __init__(self, issues_id):
        self.issues_id = issues_id

class WikiApp(morepath.App):
    def __init__(self, wiki_id):
        self.wiki_id = wiki_id

Note that IssuesApp and WikiApp expect arguments to be initialized; we’ll learn more about this later.

We now can group our paths into three. First we have the core app, which includes the repository and its settings:

@CoreApp.path(path='', model=Root)
def get_root():

@CoreApp.path(path='{user_name}', model=User)
def get_user(user_name):

@CoreApp.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}', model=Repository)
def get_repository(user_name, repository_name):

@CoreApp.path(path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/settings', model=Settings)
def get_settings(user_name, repository_name):

Then we have the paths for our issue tracker:

@IssuesApp.path(path='', model=Issues)
def get_issues():

@IssuesApp.path(path='{issue_id}', model=Issue)
def get_issue(issue_id):

And the paths for our wiki:

@WikiApp.path(path='', model=Wiki)
def get_wiki():

We have drastically simplified the paths in IssuesApp and WikiApp; we don’t deal with user_name and repository_name anymore.

Mounting apps

Now that we have an independent IssuesApp and WikiApp, we want to be able to mount these under the right URLs under CoreApp. We do this using the mount directive:

def variables(app):
    repository = get_repository_for_wiki_id(app.wiki_id)
    return dict(

               app=IssuesApp, variables=variables)
def mount_issues(user_name, repository_name):
    return IssuesApp(issues_id=get_issues_id(user_name, repository_name))

Let’s look at what this does:

  • @CoreApp.mount: We mount something onto CoreApp.
  • path='{user_name}/{repository_name}/issues': We are mounting it on that path. All sub-paths in the issue tracker app will fall under it.
  • app=IssuesApp: We are mounting IssuesApp.
  • The mount_issues function takes the path variables user_name and repository_name as arguments. It then returns an instance of the IssuesApp. To create one we need to convert the user_name and repository_name into an issues id. We do this by looking it up in some kind of database.
  • The variables function needs to do the inverse: given a WikiApp instance it needs to translate this back into a repository_name and user_name. This allows Morepath to link to a mounted WikiApp.

Mounting the wiki is very similar:

def variables(app):
    return dict(user_name=get_username_for_wiki_id(

                app=WikiApp, variables=variables)
def mount_wiki(user_name, repository_name):
    return WikiApp(get_wiki_id(user_name, repository_name))

No more path repetition

We have solved the repetition of paths issue now; the issue tracker and wiki handle many paths, but there is no more need to repeat ‘{user_name}/{repository_name}’ everywhere.

Testing in isolation

To test the issue tracker by itself, we can run it as a separate WSGI app:

def run_issue_tracker():
    mounted = IssuesApp(4)

Here we mount and run the issues_app with issue tracker id 4.

You can hook the run_issue_tracker function up to a script by using an entry point in as we’ve seen in Organizing your Project.

You can also mount applications this way in automated tests and then use WebTest or some other WSGI testing library.

Reusing an app

We can now reuse the issue tracker app in the sense that we can mount it in different apps; all we need is a way to get issues_id. What then if we have another Python project and we wanted to reuse the issue tracker in it as well? In that case it may start sense to start maintaining the issue tracker it in a separate Python project of its own.

We could for instance split our code into three separate Python projects, for instance:

  • myproject.core
  • myproject.issues

Each would be organized as described in Organizing your Project.

myproject.core could have an install_requires in its that depends on myproject.issues and To get IssuesApp and WikiApp in order to mount them in the core, we would simply import them (for instance in

from import IssuesApp
from import WikiApp

In some scenarios you may want to turn this around: the IssuesApp and WikiApp know they should be mounted in CoreApp, but the CoreApp wants to remain innocent of this. In that case, you would have myproject.issues and both depend on myproject.core, whereas myproject.core depends on nothing. The wiki and issues projects then mount themselves into the core app.

Different teams

Now that we have separate projects for the core, issue tracker and wiki, it becomes possible for a team to focus on the wiki without having to worry about core or the issue tracker and vice versa.

This may in fact be of benefit even when you alone are working on all three projects! When developing software it is important to free up your brain so you only have to worry about one detail at the time: this an important reason why we decomposition logic into functions and classes. By decomposing the project into three independent ones, you can temporarily forget about the core when you’re working on the issue tracker, allowing you to focus on the problems at hand.

Swapping in a new sub-app

Perhaps a different, better wiki implementation is developed. Let’s call it ShinyNewWikiApp. Swapping in the new sub application is easy: it’s just a matter of changing the mount directive:

               app=ShinyNewWikiApp, variables=variables)
def mount_wiki(user_name, repository_name):
    return ShinyNewWikiApp(get_wiki_id(user_name, repository_name))

Customizing an app

Let’s change gears and talk about customization now.

Imagine a scenario where a particular customer wants exactly core app. Really, it’s perfect, exactly what they need, no change needed, but then ... wait for it ... they actually do need a minor tweak.

Let’s say they want an extra view on Repository that shows some important customer-specific metadata. This metadata is retrieved from a customer-specific extra database, so we cannot just add it to core app. Besides, this new view isn’t useful to other customers.

What we need to do is create a new customer specific core app in a separate project that is exactly like the original core app by extending it, but with the one extra view added. Let’s call the project important_customer.core. important_customer.core has an install_requires in its that depends on myproject.core and also the customer database (which we call customerdatabase in this example).

Now we can import CoreApp in important_customer.core‘s module, and extend it:

from import CoreApp

class CustomerApp(CoreApp):

At this point CustomerApp and CoreApp have identical behavior. We can now make our customization and add a new JSON view to Repository:

from myproject.core.model import Repository
# customer specific database
from customerdatabase import query_metadata

@CustomerApp.json(model=Repository, name='customer_metadata')
def repository_customer_metadata(self, request):
    metadata = query_metadata( # use repository id to find it
    return {
      'special_marketing_info': medata.marketing_info,
      'internal_description': metadata.description

You can now run CustomerApp and get the core app with exactly the one tweak the customer wanted: a view with the extra metadata. The important_customer.core project depends on customerdatabase, but myproject.core remains unchanged.

We’ve made exactly the tweak necessary without having to modify our original project. The original project continues to work the same way it always did.

Swapping in, for one customer

Morepath lets you extend any directive, not just the view directive. It also lets you override things in the applications you extend. Let’s say the important customer wants exactly the original wiki, with just one tiny teeny little tweak. Other customers should still continue to use the original wiki.

We’d tweak the wiki just as we would tweak the core app. We end up with a TweakedWikiApp:

from import WikiApp

class TweakedWikiApp(WikiApp):

# some kind of tweak
@TweakedWikiApp.json(model=WikiPage, name='extra_info')
def page_extra_info(self, request):

We want a new version of CoreApp just for this customer that mounts TweakedWikiApp instead of WikiApp:

class ImportantCustomerApp(CoreApp):

                            app=TweakedWikiApp, variables=variables)
def mount_wiki(user_name, repository_name):
    return TweakedWikiApp(get_wiki_id(user_name, repository_name))

The mount directive above overrides the one in the CoreApp that we’re extending, because it uses the same path but mounts TweakedWikiApp instead.

Framework apps

A morepath.App subclass does not need to be a full working web application. Instead it can be a framework with only those paths and views that we intend to be reusable.

We could for instance have a base class Metadata and define some views for it in the framework app. If we then have an application that inherits from the framework app, any Metadata model we expose to the web using the path directive automatically gets its views supplied by the framework.

For instance:

class Framework(morepath.App):

class Metadata(object):
    def __init__(self, d):
        self.d = d # metadata dictionary

    def get_metadata(self):
        return self.d

@Framework.json(model=Metadata, name='metadata')
def metadata_view(self, request):
    return self.get_metadata()

We want to use this framework in our own application:

class App(Framework):

Let’s have a model that subclasses from Metadata:

class Document(Metadata):

Let’s put the model on a path:

@App.path(path='documents/{id}', model=Document)
def get_document(id):

Since App extends Framework, all documents published this way have a metadata view automatically. Apps that don’t extend Framework won’t have this behavior, of course.

As we mentioned before, there is a gray area between application and framework; applications tend to gain attributes of a framework, and larger frameworks start to look more like applications. Don’t worry too much about which is which, but enjoy the creative possibilities!

Note that Morepath itself is designed as an application (morepath.App) that your apps extend. This means you can override parts of it just like you would override a framework app! We did our best to make Morepath do the right thing already, but if not, you can customize it.